User agent detail

Motorola-VE20 Obigo/Q05A1 MMP/2.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MotorolaVE20 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Teleca-Obigo 5.0 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.049 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Motorola-VE20 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Obigo closeJVM MotorolaVE20mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Obigo Q05A1 MotorolaVE20smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo 5.1close MotorolaVE20closeclosecloseclose0.016 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Obigo Q05A1 Browser Q05A1 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo Q 5A MotorolaVE20mobile:featureyescloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Teleca Obigo Q05A1close MotorolaVE20Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.039 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:11 | by ThaDafinser