User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 6.1; xx) Opera 8.50
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-opera.yaml
Opera 8.50Windows 7 desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 8.50Presto 1.0Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.022 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 8.50closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 8.50closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.20002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 8.50Presto Windows 7desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 8.50closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 8.50closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.016 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 8.50closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.06901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 8.50 Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.56706 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 8.50 Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 8.52closeWindows XPDesktopcloseclose0.032 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:11 | by ThaDafinser