User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows Phone OS 7.0; Trident/3.1; IEMobile/7.0; SAMSUNG; GT-S7530)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungGT-S7530 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IEMobile 7.0Trident 3.1WinPhone7 7.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
IEMobile 7.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE Mobile 7.0closeWindows 7.0GenericWindows Phone 7mobile-browseryescloseclose0.17702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
IE Mobile 7.0Trident Windows Phone 7.0SamsungGT-S7530smartphoneyes0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeWindows Phone closeWindows Phonecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE Mobile 7.0closeWindows Phone 7.0SamsungGT-S7530closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
IE Mobile 7.0closeWindows Phone OS closecloseclosecloseclose0.12101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer Mobile 7.0Trident 3.1Windows Phone Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Mobile Internet Explorer 7.0Trident 3.1Windows Phone 7.0SamsungOmnia Mmobile:smartyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE Mobile 7.0closeWindows Phone 7.0Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:10 | by ThaDafinser