User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; AP-727G Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/30.0.1599.10549 YaBrowser/13.12.1599.10549 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
AssistantAP-727G Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Yandex Browser 13.12Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.027 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.10549closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Yandex.Browser 13.12.1599.10549closeAndroid 4.2.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.27103 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Yandex Browser 13.12Blink Android 4.2yes0.013 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Yandex 13.12.1599.10549closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Yandex Browser 13.12.1599closeAndroid 4.2.2AssistantAP-727Gcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
ABrowse closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.05101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Yandex Browser 13.12.1599.10549WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Yandex Browser 13.12Blink Android 4.2.2AP-727Gtabletyescloseclose0.08601 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.10549closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 42closeAndroid 4.2Tabletyesyescloseclose0.04801 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:09 | by ThaDafinser