User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; xx; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040805 Netscape/7.2
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-netscape.yaml
Netscape 7.2Linux Gecko 1.7.2desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Mozilla 1.7Gecko 1.7Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.039 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Netscape Navigator 7.2closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.20102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
GNU/Linux desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Netscape Navigator 7.2closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Netscape 7.2closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Netscape 7.2closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.04801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Netscape Navigator 7.2Gecko 20040805Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.43404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Netscape 7.2Gecko 1.7.2Linux desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:09 | by ThaDafinser