User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 [ja] (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Linux 2.6.11-1.1369_FC4; Playstation2)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/gaming/sony.yaml
SonyPlaystation 2gaming:console Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesFake IEBot/Crawler0.06901 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 6.0closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 6.0Trident GNU/Linux desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 6.0closeLinux 2.6.11closeclosecloseclose0.015 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 6.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.04801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 6.0Trident Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
SonyPlaystation 2gaming:consolecloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:09 | by ThaDafinser