User agent detail

HTC P3700; PPC; 480x640; OpVer 30.211.10.701 Opera/9.50(Microsoft Windows 6.1; U; en)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCP3700 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 9.50closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 9.50closeWindows 6.1HTCP3300mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 9.50Presto Windows HTCP3700smartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 9.50closeChrome OS closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 9.50closeWindows HTCP3700closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 9.50close closecloseclosecloseclose0.08701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 9.50 Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 9.50 Windows Mobile HTCTouch Diamondmobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.50closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.021 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:08 | by ThaDafinser