User agent detail

NokiaN95-5/11.2.011 Series60/3.1 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
NokiaN95-5 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.035 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
NokiaN95-5 11.2.011closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
closeSeries60 3.1NokiaN95mobile-browseryescloseclose0.22302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia OSS Browser 3.1 Symbian OS Series 60 3.1NokiaN95smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia S60 OSS Browser 11.2.011closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia Services (WAP) Browser close NokiaN95-5closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Browser for S60 OSS 3.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0.07301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Nokia Browser NokiaOS NokiaNokia N95-5closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Series60 3.1NokiaN95mobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Symbian S60 Browser closeSymbian S60 5.0NokiaFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.023 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:07 | by ThaDafinser