User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 2_2 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/525.18.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.1 Mobile/5G77 Safari/525.20
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/camouflage.yaml
Safari iPhone OS 2.2Webkit 525.18.1AppleiPhonemobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari 3.1WebKit iOS 2.0AppleiPhoneMobile Phoneyesyes0.037 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 3.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari 3.1.1closeiOS 2.2AppleiPhonemobile-browseryescloseclose0.17802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mobile Safari 3.1WebKit iOS 2.2AppleiPhonesmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 3.1.1closeiOS 2.2closeiPhonecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Mobile Safari 3.1.1closeiOS 2.2AppleiPhonecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 3.1.1closeiPhone OS 2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.07001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mobile Safari 3.1.1WebKit 525.18.1iOS 2.2AppleiPhonecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Safari Webkit 525.18.1iPhone OS 2.2AppleiPhonemobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 3.1.1closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 3.1.1closeiOS 2.2AppleiPhoneFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:07 | by ThaDafinser