User agent detail

SAMSUNG-D900E-Bouygues/D900EAGIE1 NetFront/3.5 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungD900E-Bouygues Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
NetFront 3.5NetFront Mobile Deviceyes0.05 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SAMSUNG-D900E-Bouygues D900EAGIE1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
NetFront 3.5closeJVM SamsungD900mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
NetFront 3.5NetFront SamsungD900E-Bouyguessmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
NetFront 3.5close SamsungD900E-Bouyguescloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
NetFront 3.5close closecloseclosecloseclose0.07901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
NetFront closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
NetFront 3.5 SamsungD900Emobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
NetFront 3.5close SamsungD900Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.045 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:07 | by ThaDafinser