User agent detail

Inne: Mozilla/2.0 (compatible; Ask Jeeves/Teoma; http://sp.ask.com/docs/about/tech_crawling.html)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
Ask Jeeves Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Inne closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesAsk Jeevesclose0.19202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesAsk JeevesSearch bot0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesAsk Jeevesclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesTeomaCrawler0.14601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Netscape Navigator 2.0 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesAsk Jeevesclose0.014 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Teleca Obigo Q05Aclose Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.018 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:07 | by ThaDafinser