User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; Googlebot/2.1; +http://www.google.com/bot.html) Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/Parser/fixtures/bots.yml
Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesGoogle BotBot/Crawler0.08901 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 537.36closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 537.36close desktop-browsercloseclose0.18402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesGooglebotSearch bot0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesGooglebotclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.048 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Googlebot 2.1WebKit 537.36 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesGooglebotclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesGooglebotclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close yescloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:06 | by ThaDafinser