User agent detail

Opera/8.01 (J2ME/MIDP; Opera Mini/1.1.2421/hifi/nordic/int; Samsung SGH-D600; en; U; ssr)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungSGH-D600 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mini 1.1Presto 2.2JAVA Mobile Deviceyes0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 8.01closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mini 1.1.2421closeJVM mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mini 1.1Presto SamsungSGH-D600smartphoneyes0.016 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera Mini 1.1.2421close closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mini 1.1.2421close SamsungSGH-D600closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mini 1.1.2421close closecloseclosecloseclose0.05401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini 1.1.2421 Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mini 1.1 SamsungSGH-D600; en; U; ssrmobile:featureyescloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 8.01closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.023 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:06 | by ThaDafinser