User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; ja-JP) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/30.0.1599.114 Safari/537.36 Puffin/4.6.1IT
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-821.php
Puffin 4.6iOS unknownunknown AppleiPadTabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Puffin 4.6WebKit iOS AppleiPadTabletyesyes0.07801 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.114closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Puffin 4.6.1closeiOS AppleiPadmobile-browseryescloseclose0.18002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Puffin 4.6WebKit GNU/Linux desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.114closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Puffin 4.6.1closeLinux AppleiPadcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 30.0.1599.114closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.06401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Puffin 4.6.1WebKit 537.36 iPadcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Puffin 4.6.1Blink iOS iPadtabletyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.114closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 30.0.1599.114closeLinux x86_64 Desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:06 | by ThaDafinser