User agent detail

MOZILLA50 (SYMBIANOS94 U SERIES60/50 SAMSUNG/I8910-ORANGE/
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungI8910-ORANGE Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
closeSeries60 50SamsungOmnia HDmobile-browseryescloseclose0.19102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia OSS Browser 50 Symbian OS Series 60 50SamsungI8910-ORANGEsmartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close SamsungI8910-ORANGEcloseclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Browser for S60 closeSYMBIANOS closecloseclosecloseclose0.06801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Netscape Navigator Symbian closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Series60 50SamsungOmnia HDmobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.023 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:06 | by ThaDafinser