User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (S60V3; U; ar-sa; NOKIA6720c) AppleWebKit/530.13 (KHTML, like Gecko) UCBrowser/8.6.0.199/28/444/UCWEB Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokia6720c Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.22902 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 530.13closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari close mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.6WebKit Symbian OS Series 60 V3Nokia6720csmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia S60 OSS Browser 530.13closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.6.0closeSymbian OS Nokia6720ccloseclosecloseclose0.013 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser close closecloseclosecloseclose0.06101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.6.0.199WebKit 530.13 NokiaMobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.6Gecko Series60 3Nokia6720 classicmobile:smartyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.026 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:06 | by ThaDafinser