User agent detail

Alcatel-OT-606a/1.0 Profile/MIDP-8.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 ObigoInternetBrowser/Q03C
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
AlcatelOT-606a Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Teleca-Obigo 3.0 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.04801 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Alcatel-OT-606a 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Obigo closeJVM mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Obigo Q03C AlcatelOT-606asmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo close AlcatelOT-606acloseclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Obigo Browser closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo Q 3C AlcatelOne Touch 606amobile:featureyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Teleca Obigo Q05Aclose Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.028 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:06 | by ThaDafinser