User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 ( Nokia6260s-1/2.0 (p) Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1) AppleWebKit/420+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/420+
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokia6260s-1 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.09101 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 420closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 420close desktop-browsercloseclose0.183 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Browser WebKit Symbian Nokia6260s-1smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 2.0closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia 6260close Nokia6260s-1closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.109 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari WebKit 420NokiaOS NokiaNokia 6260s-1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.409 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 420Series40 Nokia6260 slidemobile:featureyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close Nokia6260 slideFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.033 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:05 | by ThaDafinser