User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; RP-UDM02A Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/40.0.2214.111 YaBrowser/15.2.2214.3581.01 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
Yandex Browser 15.2Android 4.2unknown VericoUni PadTabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Yandex Browser 15.2Blink Android 4.2VericoUni PadTabletyesyes0.044 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 40.0.2214.111closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Yandex.Browser 15.2.2214.3581.01closeAndroid 4.2.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.285 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Yandex Browser 15.2Blink Android 4.2yes0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Yandex 15.2.2214.3581.01closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Yandex Browser 15.2.2214closeAndroid 4.2.2RP-UDM02Acloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
ABrowse closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.047 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Yandex Browser 15.2.2214.3581.1WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.445 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Yandex Browser 15.2Blink Android 4.2.2RP-UDM02Atabletyescloseclose0.08501 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 40.0.2214.111closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 42closeAndroid 4.2Tabletyesyescloseclose0.024 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:05 | by ThaDafinser