User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (X11; FreeBSD 8.4-RELEASE-p1 i386) Presto/2.12.388 Version/12.16
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-opera.yaml
Opera 12.16FreeBSD 8.4Presto 2.12.388desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 12.16Presto 2.12FreeBSD Desktop0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 12.16closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 12.16closeBSD 8.4-RELEASE-p1desktop-browsercloseclose0.174 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 12.16Presto FreeBSD 8.4desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 12.16closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 12.16closeFreeBSD 8.4closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 12.16closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.045 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 12.16Presto 2.12.388FreeBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.408 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 12.16Presto 2.12.388FreeBSD 8.4desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 12.16closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.16closeLinux x86_64 Desktopcloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:05 | by ThaDafinser