User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686) AppleWebKit/534.24 (KHTML, like Gecko) Ubuntu/11.04 Chromium/11.0.696.68 Chrome/11.0.696.68 Safari/534.24
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-chromium.yaml
Chromium 11.0.696.68Ubuntu 11.04Webkit 534.24desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chromium 11.0WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.036 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 11.0.696.68closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chromium 11.0.696.68closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.181 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chromium 11.0WebKit Ubuntu 11.04desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 11.0.696.68closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chromium 11.0.696closeUbuntu 11.4closeclosecloseclose0.018 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 11.0.696.68closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.091 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chromium 11.0.696.68WebKit 534.24Linux 11.04closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.484 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chromium 11.0.696.68Webkit 534.24Ubuntu 11.04desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 11.0.696.68closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:04 | by ThaDafinser