User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Java; U; Id; samsung gt-c5212i) UCBrowser8.3.0.154/69/405/UCWEB Mobile, SAMSUNG-GT-C5212i/C5212iDDJH6 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 UP.Browser/6.2.3.3.c.1.102 (GUI) MMP/2.0 Untrusted/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Samsunggt-c5212i Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.11201 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2.3.3.c.1.102close mobile-browseryescloseclose0.244 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.3 Samsunggt-c5212ismartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.3.0close Samsunggt-c5212icloseclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser close closecloseclosecloseclose0.061 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.3.0.154 SamsungMobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.425 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 6.2 Samsunggt-c5212imobile:featureyescloseclose0.014 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.023 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:03 | by ThaDafinser