User agent detail

OneBrowser/3.1 (SonyEricssonK510a/R4EA031)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SonyEricssonK510a Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
OneBrowser 3.1WebKit Mobile Phoneyesyes0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
OneBrowser 3.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
OneBrowser 3.1close Sony EricssonK510amobile-browseryescloseclose0.182 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
ONE Browser 3.1WebKit Sony EricssonK510afeature phoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
ONE Browser 3.1close SonyEricssonK510acloseclosecloseclose0.015 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
OneBrowser 3.1 Sony EricssonSony Ericsson K510acloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.415 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
OneBrowser 3.1 Sony EricssonK510amobile:featureyescloseclose0.014 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:03 | by ThaDafinser