User agent detail

LG-CU915/V1.0h Obigo/Q05A Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 UNTRUSTED/1.0 UCWEB/2.0 (Java; U; MIDP-2.0; es-LA; LG-CU915) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.3.0.326 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGCU915 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Teleca-Obigo 5.0 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.04501 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
LG-CU915 V1.0hcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Obigo closeJVM GenericJ2ME Midletmobile-browseryescloseclose0.188 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.3 LGCU915smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.3.0close LGCU915closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.048 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Obigo Q05A Browser Q05A LGLGCU915closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo Q 5AGecko LGCU915mobile:featureyescloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Teleca Obigo Q05Aclose LGCU915Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.04 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:02 | by ThaDafinser