User agent detail

KDDI-CA3H UP.Browser/6.2_7.2.7.1.K.5.214 (GUI) MMP/2.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/feature_phone.yml
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2 KDDICA3Hfeature phone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.028 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
KDDI-CA3H closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2close KDDICA005mobile-browseryescloseclose0.216 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2 KDDICA3Hfeature phoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseclose0.014 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.409 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 6.2 CasioCA005mobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
au by KDDI CA3Hcloseclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close KDDICA005Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.022 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:01 | by ThaDafinser