User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (J2ME/MIDP; Opera Mini/8.0.35626/35.7382; U; xx) Presto/2.8.119 Version/11.10
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-opera.yaml
Opera Mini 8.0 Presto 2.8.119mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mini 8.0Presto 2.8JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.05501 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 11.10closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mini 8.0.35626closeJVM OperaMini 5mobile-browseryescloseclose0.311 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mini 8.0Presto 0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera Mini 8.0.35626close closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mini 8.0.35626close closeclosecloseclose0.019 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mini 8.0.35626close closecloseclosecloseclose0.066 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini 8.0.35626Presto 2.8.119 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.369 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mini 8.0Presto 2.8.119 mobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 11.10closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera Mini 8.0close OperaMini 5Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.028 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:01 | by ThaDafinser