User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; OpenBSD amd64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/28.0.1500.45 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Chrome 28.0.1500.45OpenBSD Blink desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 28.0Blink OpenBSD Desktop0.15802 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 28.0.1500.45closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 28.0.1500.45closeBSD desktop-browsercloseclose0.202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 28.0Blink OpenBSD desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 28.0.1500.45closeOpenBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 28.0.1500closeOpenBSD closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 28.0.1500.45closeOpenBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.13 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 28.0.1500.45WebKit 537.36OpenBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.382 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 28Blink OpenBSD desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 28.0.1500.45closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 28.0.1500.95closeWindows 8Desktopcloseclose0.024 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:01 | by ThaDafinser