User agent detail

LGE-CU8080/1.0 UP.Browser/4.1.26l UP.Link/5.1.2.9
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGCU8080 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1 LGCU8080Mobile Phoneyes0.025 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
LGE-CU8080 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1.26lclose LGCU8080mobile-browseryescloseclose0.211 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1 LGCU8080smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 4.1.26close LGCU8080closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1.26l closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 4.1 LGCU8080mobile:featureyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close LGCU8080Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.03 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:01 | by ThaDafinser