User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:2.0) Gecko/20110417 IceCat/4.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
Linux Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Mozilla 2.0Gecko 2.0Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.05701 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
IceCat 4.0closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.186 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
GNU/Linux desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
IceCat 4.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IceCat 4.0closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
IceCat 4.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.058 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 2.0Gecko 20110417Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.411 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
IceCat 4.0Gecko 2.0Linux desktopcloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:00 | by ThaDafinser