User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (GT-I9300 samsung; NetatmoApp/v1.1.4.2 Android 4.3) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A334 Safari/7534.48.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungNetatmoApp Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari 5.1closeAndroid GenericAndroid 4.3mobile-browseryescloseclose0.344 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.3SamsungGALAXY S IIIsmartphoneyes0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 5.1closeAndroid 4.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.3closeAndroid 4.3SamsungNetatmoAppcloseclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.046 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 5.1WebKit 534.46Android 4.3SamsungGalaxy S IIIcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 534.46Android 4.3Samsung; NetatmoAppmobile:smartyescloseclose0.08301 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 5.1closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.3closeAndroid 4.3Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.041 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:00 | by ThaDafinser