User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 9.1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A334 Safari/7534.48.3 QHBrowser/238
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-360.yaml
Qihoo 360 Browser 2.3.8iOS 9.1Webkit 534.46AppleiPhonemobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari 5.1WebKit iOS AppleiPhoneMobile Phoneyesyes0.05901 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari 5.1closeiOS AppleiPhonemobile-browseryescloseclose0.183 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mobile Safari 5.1WebKit iOS 9.1AppleiPhonesmartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 5.1closeiOS 9closeiPhonecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Mobile Safari 5.1closeiOS 9.1AppleiPhonecloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 5.1closeiPhone OS 9.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.094 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mobile Safari 5.1WebKit 534.46iOS 9AppleiPhonecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Qihoo 360 Browser 2.3.8Webkit 534.46iOS 9.1AppleiPhonemobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 5.1closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 5.1closeiOS AppleiPhoneFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.021 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:00 | by ThaDafinser