User agent detail

Opera/8.01 (J2ME/MIDP; Opera Mini/1.1.3314/hifi/tmobile/cz; Siemens ME75; cs; U; ssr)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-opera.yaml
Opera Mini 1.1 SiemensME75mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mini 1.1Presto 2.2JAVA Mobile Deviceyes0.03 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 8.01closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mini 1.1.3314closeJVM OperaMini 1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.233 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mini 1.1Presto SiemensME75smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera Mini 1.1.3314close closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mini 1.1.3314close closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mini 1.1.3314close closecloseclosecloseclose0.053 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini 1.1.3314 Mobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mini 1.1 SiemensME75mobile:featureyescloseclose0.014 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 8.01closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera Mini 1.1close OperaMini 1Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.019 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:24:59 | by ThaDafinser