User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Series30Plus; Nokia220/10.03.11; Profile/Series30Plus Configuration/Series30Plus) Gecko/20100401 S40OviBrowser/3.8.1.0.5
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-373.php
Nokia Proxy Browser 3.8SymbianOS unknownunknown Nokia220Mobile Phoneyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia Proxy Browser 3.8Gecko SymbianOS Nokia220Mobile Phoneyes0.13401 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
IBrowse close desktop-browsercloseclose0.201 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Ovi Browser 3.8Gecko Symbian Nokia220smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 10.03.11;closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Ovi Browser 3.8.1closeNokia Series 30 Plus Nokia220closeclosecloseclose0.012 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.177 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Ovi Browser 3.8.1.0.5Gecko 20100401NokiaOS NokiaNokia 220closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.503 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Nokia Xpress 3.8.1Gecko Series30+ Nokia220mobile:featureyescloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
S40 Ovi Browser 3.8closeNokia Series 40 Nokia220Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:24:59 | by ThaDafinser