User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; th-TH@calendar=gregorian) AppleWebKit/534.12 (KHTML, like Gecko) Puffin/1.3.2665MS Safari/534.12
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-876.php
Puffin 1.3Android unknownunknown unknowngeneral Mobile PhoneMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Puffin 1.3WebKit Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.035 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 534.12closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 534.12closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.187 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Puffin 1.3WebKit GNU/Linux desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Puffin 1.3.2665closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.162 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Puffin 1.3.2665MWebKit 534.12 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Puffin 1.3Webkit 534.12Linux desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:24:59 | by ThaDafinser