User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (AmigaOS 4; PPC; InternetSurfboard; U; xx) AppleWebKit/533.3 (KHTML, like Gecko) InternetSurfboard/0.002 Safari/533.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-amigaos.yaml
InternetSurfboard 0.002AmigaOS 4Webkit 533.3desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesAmigaBot/Crawler0.12501 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 533.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
InternetSurfboard 0.002closeAmiga OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.187 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari WebKit AmigaOS desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari close closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Surf closeAmigaOS 4closecloseclosecloseclose0.064 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari WebKit 533.3Mac closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
InternetSurfboard 0.002Webkit 533.3AmigaOS 4desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:24:59 | by ThaDafinser