User agent detail

SonyEricssonG700/R100 Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Symbian OS; 958) Opera 8.65 [en]
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-symbian.yaml
Opera Mobile 8.65UIQ Sony EricssonG700mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 8.65Presto 2.2SymbianOS Mobile Phoneyes0.03 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 8.65closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 8.65closeSymbian OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.185 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 8.65Presto Symbian OS Sony EricssonG700smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 8.65close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 8.65closeSymbian OS SonyEricssonG700closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 8.65closeSymbian OS closecloseclosecloseclose0.043 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 8.65 Symbian Sony EricssonSony Ericsson G700closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 8.65 UIQ Sony EricssonG700mobile:featureyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close SonyEricssonG700Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.02 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:24:59 | by ThaDafinser