User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (SH05C;FOMA;like Gecko)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-539.php
Sharp 0.0SymbianOS unknownunknown NTT DocomoSH-05CMobile Phoneyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Sharp Gecko SymbianOS NTT DocomoSH-05CMobile Phoneyes0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
close SharpSH05Cmobile-browseryescloseclose0.184 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
No result found
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close DoCoMoSH05Ccloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.058 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 5.0 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.403 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
SharpSH05Cmobile:featureyescloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
docomo SH05Ccloseclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close DoCoMoSH-01AFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:24:58 | by ThaDafinser