User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111101 SUSE/3.6.24-0.2.1 Firefox/3.6.24
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Firefox 3.6.24SUSE 3.6.24Gecko desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 3.6Gecko 1.9.2Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.14201 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 3.6.24closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 3.6.24closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.185 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 3.6Gecko SUSE 3.6desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 3.6.24closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 3.6.24closeSUSE closeclosecloseclose0.014 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 3.6.24closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.123 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 3.6.24Gecko 20111101Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.408 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 3.6.24Gecko 1.9.2SUSE 3.6desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 3.6.24closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:24:58 | by ThaDafinser