User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; xx) AppleWebKit/534.13 (KHTML, like Gecko) Ubuntu/10.10 Chromium/9.0.597.107 Chrome/9.0.597.107 Safari/534.13
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-chromium.yaml
Chromium 9.0.597.107Ubuntu 10.10Webkit 534.13desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chromium 9.0WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.05 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 9.0.597.107closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chromium 9.0.597.107closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chromium 9.0WebKit Ubuntu 10.10desktop0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 9.0.597.107closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chromium 9.0.597closeUbuntu 10.10closeclosecloseclose0.018 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 9.0.597.107closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.054 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chromium 9.0.597.107WebKit 534.13Linux 10.10closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.46205 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chromium 9.0.597.107Webkit 534.13Ubuntu 10.10desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 9.0.597.107closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 9.1.0.0closeLinux x86_64 Desktopcloseclose0.021 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:24:57 | by ThaDafinser