User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (lg; lg-Gr500/1.0; U; Bada/1.0; pt-br) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Dolfin/2.0 Mobile WQVGA SMM-MMS/1.2.0 OPN-B
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGGr500 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Dolfin 2.0WebKit Bada 1.0Mobile Deviceyes0.15902 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 533.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Dolphin 2.0closeBada 1.0mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Dolphin 2.0WebKit Bada 1.0LGGr500smartphoneyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Dolfin 2.0closeBada 1.0LGGr500closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Dolfin 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.05201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
5.0WebKit 533.1 LGLGGr500closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.43404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Dolfin 2.0Webkit 533.1Bada 1.0lglg-Gr500mobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.038 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:24:57 | by ThaDafinser