User agent detail

JUC(Linux;U;Android4.0.4;Zh_cn;GT-S6012;240*320;)UCWEB7.8.0.95/139/351
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
Android 4.0.4 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 7.8WebKit Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.029 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
JUC closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeAndroid 4.0.4GenericAndroid 2.0mobile-browseryescloseclose0.29303 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 7.8 Android SamsungGT-S6012smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 7.8.0closeAndroid 4.0.4SamsungGT-S6012closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 7.8.0.95closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.06201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 7.8.0.95 Android Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 7.8 Android 4.0.4SamsungGalaxy Music Duosmobile:smartyescloseclose0.09801 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.03 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:24:55 | by ThaDafinser