User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Tizen 2.2; SEC_SC-001) AppleWebKit/537.3 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/2.2 Mobile Safari/537.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-tizen.yaml
Samsung Browser Tizen 2.2Webkit 537.3SamsungSC-001 prototypemobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Samsung WebView 2.2WebKit Tizen 2.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.035 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari 2.2closeLinux mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mobile Safari 2.2WebKit Tizen 2.2yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 2.2closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari 2.2closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 2.2closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.053 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit 537.3Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.48505 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Samsung Browser Webkit 537.3Tizen 2.2SamsungSC-001 prototypemobile:smartyescloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 2.2closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 2.2closeLinux TizenFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.021 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:24:54 | by ThaDafinser