User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/31.0.1650.63 Safari/537.36 SUSE/31.0.1650.63
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Chrome 31.0.1650.63SUSE 31.0.1650.63Blink desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 31.0Blink Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.06201 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.63closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 31.0.1650.63closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 31.0Blink SUSE 31.0desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.63closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 31.0.1650closeSUSE closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 31.0.1650.63closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.09801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 31.0.1650.63WebKit 537.36Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 31Blink SUSE desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.63closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 31.0.1650.63closeLinux i686 Desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:24:53 | by ThaDafinser