User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; xx) Opera 9.64
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-opera.yaml
Opera 9.64Windows XP desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 9.64Presto 2.0WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.025 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 9.64closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 9.64closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.23302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 9.64Presto Windows XPdesktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 9.64closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 9.64closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 9.64closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.08101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 9.64 Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 9.64 Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:24:53 | by ThaDafinser