User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.4; PMID901 Build/IMM76D) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/27.0.1453.90 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
PolaroidPMID901 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 27.0WebKit Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.06101 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 27.0.1453.90closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 27.0.1453.90closeAndroid 4.0.4desktop-browsercloseclose0.30303 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 27.0WebKit Android 4.0PolaroidPMID901tabletyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 27.0.1453.90closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 27.0.1453closeAndroid 4.0.4PolaroidPMID901closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.07401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 27.0.1453.90WebKit 537.36Android 4.0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 27Blink Android 4.0.4PolaroidPMID 901tabletyescloseclose0.033 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 27.0.1453.90closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0Tabletyesyescloseclose0.04 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:24:53 | by ThaDafinser