User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.16) Gecko/20110323 Ubuntu/10.10 (maverick) Firefox/3.6.16
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-618.php
Firefox 3.6Ubuntu 10.101.9.2 unknownLinux DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 3.6Gecko 1.9.2Ubuntu 10.10Linux DesktopDesktop0.06801 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 3.6.16closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 3.6.16closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 3.6Gecko Ubuntu 10.10desktop0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 3.6.16closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 3.6.16closeUbuntu 10.10closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 3.6.16closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.06201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 3.6.16Gecko 20110323Linux 10.10closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.45805 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 3.6.16Gecko 1.9.2Ubuntu 10.10desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 3.6.16closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:24:52 | by ThaDafinser