User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.0.4; zh-CN; BIRD T900 Build/MocorDroid4.0.4) AppleWebKit/534.31 (KHTML, like Gecko) UCBrowser/9.2.3.324 U3/0.8.0 Mobile Safari/534.31
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone.yml
UC Browser 9.2.3.324MocorDroid 4.0.4WebKit BirdT900smartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.2U3 Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.032 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 534.31closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser 9.2.3.324closeAndroid 4.0.4GenericAndroid 4.0mobile-browseryescloseclose0.27803 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.2WebKit MocorDroid 4.0BirdT900smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.2.3closeAndroid 4.0.4BirdT900closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.05101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.2.3.324WebKit 534.31Android 4.0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.2Webkit 534.31Android 4.0.4BirdT900mobile:smartyescloseclose0.02 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 9closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.02 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:24:51 | by ThaDafinser