User agent detail

MOZILLA40 (COMPATIBLE MSIE 50 SERIES8020 NOKIA9300I
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokia9300I Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.08001 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Edge 50closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Internet Explorer 50close Nokia9300Imobile-browseryescloseclose0.22702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 50Trident Symbian Nokia9300Ismartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 50closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close Nokia9300Icloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
MSIE close closecloseclosecloseclose0.08901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 50Trident Nokiacloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 50 Nokia9300Imobile:featureyescloseclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:24:51 | by ThaDafinser