User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.4; KFJWI Build/IMM76D) AppleWebKit/535.19 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/18.0.1025.133 Safari/535.19
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
AmazonKindle Fire HD 8.9" WiFi Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 18.0WebKit Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.09201 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.133closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 18.0.1025.133closeAndroid 4.0.4desktop-browsercloseclose0.28703 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 18.0WebKit Android 4.0AmazonKindle Fire HD 8.9" WiFitabletyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.133closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 18.0.1025closeAndroid 4.0.4AmazonKindle Fire HD 8.9" WiFicloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.09901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 18.0.1025.133WebKit 535.19Android 4.0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Amazon WebView Webkit 535.19FireOS AmazonKindle Fire HD 8.9"tabletyescloseclose0.014 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.133closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 31closeAndroid 4.0AmazonKFJWITabletyesyescloseclose0.08201 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:24:51 | by ThaDafinser