User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Jolicloud Linux i686) AppleWebKit/537.6 (KHTML, like Gecko) Joli OS/1.2 Chromium/23.0.1240.0 Chrome/23.0.1240.0 Safari/537.6
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-joli.yaml
Chromium 23.0.1240.0Joli OS 1.2Webkit 537.6desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chromium 23.0WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.04901 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 23.0.1240.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chromium 23.0.1240.0closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.21902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chromium 23.0WebKit GNU/Linux desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 23.0.1240.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chromium 23.0.1240closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 23.0.1240.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.09101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chromium 23.0.1240.0WebKit 537.6Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chromium 23.0.1240.0Webkit 537.6Joli OS 1.2desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 23.0.1240.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 23.0.1271.64closeWindows XPDesktopcloseclose0.019 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:24:51 | by ThaDafinser